![]() |
||||||||||||||
| Pollutant trading discussion throughout the United States and international forums is linked to this website on about a quarterly basis. Pollutant trading discussion from previous weeks will continue to be listed here but articles may be subject to newspaper source archiving, which will affect access to articles. This website links to quarterly pollutant trading discussion throughout
the United States and international forums. We will endeavor to update
this site, as often as possible, with key pollutant trading issues raised in
the national and international media. Currently, items linked by this
website are obtained from policy discussion websites as well as online
newspapers. The views expressed in these articles and linked websites do not necessarily reflect LEA, Inc.'s opinion. Choice of sources may be expanded in the future if needed.
Pollutant Trading Discussion Links: A Financial Times investigation indicates Industry caught in carbon ‘smokescreen’. [FT, April 25, 2007] Companies and individuals rushing to go green have been spending millions on “carbon credit” projects that yield few if any environmental benefits. Widespread failings in the new markets for greenhouse gases suggest some organisations are paying for emissions reductions that do not take place. A New York Times editorial, Taming Fossil Fuels [NYT, March 17, 2007], discusses the convergence of industry and investor response to reducing greenhouse gases. Technology will play an key role, but authors of a M.I.T. report, writing in The Wall Street Journal, argue that the most effective way to reduce emissions is to attach a proportional price to carbon emissions, either as a carbon tax or through a cap-and-trade program as proposed in some legislation in Congress. Requiring emitters to reasonably pay to pollute would do more than other known incentives to bring new technologies to commercial development. In an International Herald Tribune interview Chirac tells U.S. to sign climate accord or face taxes (IHT, February 1, 2007). CBS discusses how emissions 'cap and trade' may be an economic tool in Global Warming Debate Shifts To Who Pays [CBS, February 2, 2007]. The Christian Science Monitor reports how an air pollution emissions 'cap and trade' system can be used to help reduce greenhouse gases but the approach is harder in practice than in theory (On global warming, what US can learn from Europe; CSM, January 30, 2007).
You may contact us at
Liberte Environmental
Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 3678 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070-3678 Tel: 503 582-1558 |
||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||